aa desklogo urlblack 2026
GET OUR NEWSLETTER

Monday, June 8, 2026

NEWS ALERT

CNBC: ChatGPT developer OpenAI files confidential S-1 with financial regulators

STREAMTV SHOW

Just one week left to buy your pass — use code DESK10 at check-out for a 10% discount


The Desk appreciates the support of readers who purchase products or services through links on our website. Learn more...
FIRST ON THE DESK

Freedom of Press Foundation sues DOJ to uncover legal abuses against journalists

Photo of author
By:
»

mkeys@thedesk.net

Share:

The watchdog organization Freedom of the Press Foundation (FPF) has filed a federal lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) seeking records related to the FBI’s January raid on the home of Washington Post reporter Hannah Natanson.

The lawsuit, filed under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) with assistance from Free Information Group, seeks to determine whether the Justice Department has adopted a broader practice of withholding information about statutory press protections when seeking search warrants involving journalists.

At issue is the Privacy Protection Act of 1980, a federal law that generally bars government searches of newsrooms and journalists’ homes for work product and documentary materials, except under limited circumstances.

FPF said the Justice Department failed to provide records requested after the January 14 raid, including documents that could show whether prosecutors intentionally omitted references to the Privacy Protection Act while seeking authorization to search Natanson’s home and electronic devices.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Gordon Kromberg previously acknowledged he was aware of the law but said he was following “department policy” when he did not raise it during the warrant process, according to FPF. The organization later filed a bar complaint against Kromberg over the matter.

In February, a federal judge blocked the government from searching Natanson’s devices, finding that the Justice Department’s failure to disclose the Privacy Protection Act to the court undermined confidence in the government’s representations.

Magistrate Judge William Porter also described the search in the context of broader concerns involving retaliation against the press and actions against federal employees perceived as disloyal at several government agencies.

FPF Chief of Advocacy Seth Stern said the case raises significant concerns for investigative journalism and source protection.

“The Department of Justice’s decision to hide controlling federal law from a court to execute a midnight raid on a journalist’s home is a terrifying overreach that threatens the core of investigative journalism,” Stern said in a statement.

Lauren Harper, the Chair on Government Security at the FPF, said the lawsuit was necessary because the Justice Department had not produced records in response to the organization’s FOIA request.

“The DOJ’s flagrant disregard for press freedom is compounded by the administration’s attack on transparency and disregard for FOIA,” Harper said.

The lawsuit seeks records that could clarify whether the omission in Natanson’s case was isolated or part of a broader internal Justice Department practice. Ginger Quintero-McCall, a partner at Free Information Group, said the public has a right to know whether the agency has an official policy of withholding relevant press protections from judges.

Never miss a story

Get free breaking news alerts and twice-weekly digests delivered to your inbox.

We do not share your e-mail address with third parties; you can unsubscribe at any time.

Photo of author

About the Author:

Matthew Keys

Matthew Keys is the award-winning founder and editor of TheDesk.net, an authoritative voice on broadcast and streaming TV, media and tech. With over ten years of experience, he's a recognized expert in broadcast, streaming, and digital media, with work featured in publications such as StreamTV Insider and Digital Content Next, and past roles at Thomson Reuters and Disney-ABC Television Group.
TheDesk.net is free to read — please help keep it that way.We rely on advertising revenue to support our original journalism and analysis. Please disable your ad-blocking technology to continue enjoying our content.Learn how to disable your ad blocker on: Chrome | Firefox | Safari | Microsoft Edge | Opera | AdBlock pluginAlternatively, add us as a preferred source on Google to unlock access to this website.If you think this is an error, please contact us.