Logo of TheDesk.net
GET OUR NEWSLETTER

Friday, November 13, 2026

Q3 EARNINGS

Get the latest reports on tech and media earnings — click or tap here

NEWS ALERT

Officials: Telecom outage triggers nation-wide ground stop of air traffic


The Desk appreciates the support of readers who purchase products or services through links on our website. Learn more...
promo ott x summit 728x90 banner

NARB says Mint Mobile should disclose up-front pricing in ads

T-Mobile CEO Mike Sievert (left) and actor Ryan Reynolds announce T-Mobile's acquisition of Mint Mobile. (Still frame courtesy T-Mobile, Graphic by The Desk)
T-Mobile CEO Mike Sievert (left) and actor Ryan Reynolds announce T-Mobile’s acquisition of Mint Mobile. (Still frame courtesy T-Mobile, Graphic by The Desk)

A panel for the National Advertising Review Board (NARB) is urging Mint Mobile to modify its marketing to consumers after finding some of the wireless company’s advertised prices had the potential to mislead phone shoppers.

On Thursday, the NARB said Mint Mobile’s use of per-month pricing in some of its commercials was potentially deceiving because the wireless phone provider generally requires customers to pay for several months of service at a time.

For instance, some advertisements say Mint Mobile offers wireless service for as little as $15 per month, but doesn’t conspicuously disclose that the low price of phone service is only applicable when customers buy three months of service at a time.

promo ott x summit 336x280 cube

The NARB also said Mint Mobile should stop disparaging rival phone company Verizon in social media posts, and discontinue the use of certain language that suggested Mint passed on certain savings to customers by cutting out certain retail services.

Verizon first complained about Mint Mobile’s marketing and social media activities last year, filing a grievance with the National Advertising Division (NAD), which operates as an extension of the Better Business Bureau.

Last October, the NAD upheld some of Verizon’s complaints, telling Mint it should fully disclose the upfront price of its unlimited wireless talk and data plans and stop disparaging Verizon on social media. In some cases, Mint Mobile’s social media posts contained the hashtag “#verizonsucks” and accused the company of charging for perks that customers previously received for free.

In its order, the NAD said Mint Mobile had the opportunity to explain why it felt Verizon sucked and to justify its other social media posts, but Mint “did not adequately support these broad disparaging messages.”

Mint disagreed with the order and appealed it, which brought the issue before the NARB. On Thursday, NARB said it upheld the NAD’s earlier decision in full. Mint intends to comply with the recommendations, but still says it disagrees with the outcome of the case, an official with the NARB said in a statement on Thursday.

Verizon competitor T-Mobile agreed to acquire the parent company of Mint Mobile last March. The purchase is still pending certain regulatory approvals, and could be challenged by the U.S. Department of Justice.

Never miss a story

Get free breaking news alerts and twice-weekly digests delivered to your inbox.

We do not share your e-mail address with third parties; you can unsubscribe at any time.

TVOT SF Promo

Some links in our articles are affiliate links, and we may earn a small commission on purchases at no cost to you. Affiliate partners never review our stories before publication. Read more about our editorial policies, including our use of affiliate links, by clicking or tapping here.

Photo of author

About the Author:

Matthew Keys

Matthew Keys is the award-winning founder and editor of TheDesk.net, an authoritative voice on broadcast and streaming TV, media and tech. With over ten years of experience, he's a recognized expert in broadcast, streaming, and digital media, with work featured in publications such as StreamTV Insider and Digital Content Next, and past roles at Thomson Reuters and Disney-ABC Television Group.