The Desk appreciates the support of readers who purchase products or services through links on our website. Learn more...

Most Americans pay for live television, study reveals

Photo of author
By:
»

mkeys@thedesk.net

Share:
The home screen of streaming TV service Vidgo.
Vidgo is a cable-like streaming service that offers live access to premium networks like ESPN, Fox News and Fox Sports. (Graphic by The Desk)

Nearly half of American households are still paying for cable, satellite or an equivalent TV service in order to watch live content like news and sports, according to a new survey released this week.

The study, released by Leichtman Research Group, found 49 percent of American households with a TV set are paying for a traditional television service, down from 57 percent reported one year ago and 78 percent in 2018.

Just 15 percent of American households who have moved on to a streaming cable TV equivalent like YouTube TV, Fubo or Vidgo.

Leichtman Research has been surveying the American pay television landscape for more than two decades. Over time, the number of Americans who are shelling out their hard-earned money to pay for television service has decreased — and, at the same time, the costs associated with cable, satellite and streaming cable-like service has gone up, a byproduct of broadcast and cable channel owners charging more for their programming.

“The percent of U.S. TV households with a live pay TV service waned over the past decade, with a more precipitous decline over the past five years,” Bruce Leichtman, the president and principal analyst for Leichtman Research, said in a statement. “The penetration of pay TV remains lowest among younger adults and the categories that they tend to populate, including movers and renters. Today, 56 percent of ages 18 to 44 have a pay TV service, compared to 83 percent a decade ago.”

An earlier report released by Leichtman Research claimed major pay television providers lost a cumulative 1.73 million customers during the second quarter of this year. By comparison, pay television providers lost around 1.725 million customers during the same period in 2022, the report said.

While traditional cable and satellite products have been shedding customers, those who want access to local news and premium sports offerings are increasingly turning to streaming equivalents — but there are signs that momentum is slowing as well.

Leichtman Research reported streaming cable-like services, or vMVPDs, lost around 115,000 subscribers during the second quarter of this year. That figure was apparently offset by slight gains at YouTube TV — which has become one of the most-dominant streaming services offering premium live TV — but still nearly double the 65,000 customers who dropped their vMVPD subscription during the same time frame in 2022.

The reports didn’t say how many customers are opting for free broadcast television for local news and sports, or who are switching to video on-demand streaming services for their content needs.

Never miss a story

Get free breaking news alerts and twice-weekly digests delivered to your inbox.

We do not share your e-mail address with third parties; you can unsubscribe at any time.

Photo of author

About the Author:

Matthew Keys

Matthew Keys is the award-winning founder and editor of TheDesk.net, an authoritative voice on broadcast and streaming TV, media and tech. With over ten years of experience, he's a recognized expert in broadcast, streaming, and digital media, with work featured in publications such as StreamTV Insider and Digital Content Next, and past roles at Thomson Reuters and Disney-ABC Television Group.
TheDesk.net is free to read — please help keep it that way.

We rely on advertising revenue to support our original journalism and analysis.
Please disable your ad-blocking technology to continue enjoying our content.Learn how to disable your ad blocker on:
Chrome | Firefox | Safari | Microsoft Edge | Opera | AdBlock plugin

Alternatively, add us as a preferred source on Google to unlock access to this website.

If you think this is an error, please contact us.